DEVELOPING CRS PROGRAMS FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION

A Report on Developing a PPI in the Real World

Project Overview

Through this project — funded by the EPA Gulf of Mexico Program — coastal communities in Mississippi and Louisiana participating in the National Flood Insurance Program and the Community Rating System (CRS) received training and technical assistance in the creation of Programs for Public Information at a critical time in the development of this new outreach activity.

The 2013 CRS Coordinators’ Manual changed the scoring system for communities in the CRS. Communities no longer receive CRS credit for participating in CRS users groups. However, the new manual creates a new creditable outreach activity – the Program for Public Information. Communities previously participating in CRS users groups sought assistance in transitioning to a Program for Public Information. To avoid losing CRS points, communities needed a Program for Public Information in place before their next cycle visit.

What is a Program for Public Information (PPI)?

A Program for Public Information (PPI) is a committee-based localized approach to community outreach on flood hazards and flood insurance under the Community Rating System (CRS) program. The PPI was a newly created, creditable outreach activity under the 2013 CRS Coordinator’s Manual, Activity 330.

The goal of a PPI is to encourage community outreach that is:

  • Designed to meet local needs, and
  • Is monitored, evaluated, and revised to improve effectiveness.

The PPI is a valuable tool for CRS communities because it provides additional credit for outreach that is coordinated through the program.

  • DSCN1613

    DSCN1613

Community Partners

*As part of this effort, project team members met with several other communities not listed above. These communities decided, for various reasons, to not pursue developing a full PPI at this time so are not featured on this website aside from being indicated with gray stars on the map above.

ms-thumb

Mississippi

Biloxi sought to develop a Program for Public Information as a new avenue for CRS outreach points. They chose to pursue a single jurisdiction Program for Public Information.
Learn More
la-thumb

Louisiana

Three parishes – Cameron, Calcasieu, and Vermilion – decided to complete the PPI using the multi-jurisdiction format.
Learn More

Timeline

 

See selected events in these communities’ flood stories.

What did we do?

The project team worked through local partners and CRS Users Groups (self-organizing groups who share information about the CRS) in Mississippi and Louisiana, to assist local communities in the development of a Program for Public Information. In Louisiana, efforts focused on developing a Program for Public Information with Vermillion, Cameron, and Calcasieu Parishes. In Mississippi, a Program for Public Information was developed with the City of Biloxi.

0
CRS Users Groups
0
States
0
Communities Directly Assisted

Key PPI Milestones

01.

Complete Community Self-Assessment

The CRS Community Self Assessment helps communities identify their risks and opportunities.

02.

Identify PPI Committee Members

The PPI committee is the focal point for discussions and decisions. The PPI committee has members from both inside and outside the local government.

03.

Identify Target Areas, Messages, & Audiences

Before it can develop a local program for raising public awareness about flood-related issues, the committee needs to assess its flood problems, identify who needs to be informed, and determine what projects are already underway.

04.

Get Approval of Local Governing Body

The PPI document must achieve formal, official status within the community. This is usually done by adoption or formal approval by the community’s governing body.

The Program for Public Information Committee

The PPI operates through a committee made up of local government employees and community stakeholders.

A PPI can be structured in two different ways. It can be a single jurisdiction (only one city, county, or parish) or a multi-jurisdiction (more than one city, county, or parish) PPI. The distinctions include:

Single Jurisdiction

  • Minimum of 5 members
    • Local Government
      • Floodplain Manager
      • Public Information Officer
    • Community
      • 3 community members for a committee of 5
    • Must have equal or greater representation of community stakeholders (for example, a Committee with 4 city employees must also have at least 4 community stakeholders)

Multi Jurisdiction

  • Minimum of 2 members from each community
    • 1 local government representative
    • 1 community stakeholder representative
  • At least half of each community’s representatives must be from outside of local government (for example, if a community sends 2 local government representatives, it must also have 2 community stakeholders)
  • At least half of the members must attend all of the meetings; there must be a quorum from each community

A PPI Committee that includes representatives from the insurance industry and mortgage lending industry may qualify for additional points under CRS Activity 370.

Lessons Learned

  • Single vs Multi-jurisdiction: In many cases, creating a single jurisdiction PPI may be easier than a multi-jurisdictional one. Think about what makes the most sense for the communities involved and the additional layer of coordination that will be required for meeting the PPI requirements.
  • Realistic Timeline: Creating the PPI and working through the approval process will take longer than expected. The PPIs featured on this website took over two years to draft, finalize, and be adopted. Make sure to set realistic expectations at the beginning of the project.
  • Working Document: You will likely forget to include some actions on your activity spreadsheet; do not let the worry of leaving something off hinder forward movement on the document. You can always add additional activities to it down the road.
  • Clear Messaging: Make sure to take time to have the community’s governing body understand the purpose of the PPI. For this project, we did presentations to the city council and parish police juries on basics of flood insurance, the Community Rating System, and the PPI itself well in advance of asking them to approve the document.

Project Team

MASGC logo blue transparent background

Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium

Stephen Deal | scdeal@olemiss.edu
Tracie Sempier | tracie.sempier@usm.edu
LSG-logo-round

Louisiana Sea Grant

Melissa Daigle | mtrosc2@tigers.lsu.edu
Niki Pace | nlpace@lsu.edu

Web design and construction + technical support provided by Wesley Shaw

Special thanks to Jessica Kuonen, Michael Heaton, and Morgan Ducote for their review of materials.

Project Funding

 This project was funded by the EPA Gulf of Mexico Program (Funding Opportunity Number: EPA-GM-2013-1 | CFDA# 66.475)

GulfMexico Logo T
iu

Additional Information

To learn more, please download the full report or contact the team with questions.

Questions?

Niki L. Pace, JD, LLM, CFM
Louisiana Sea Grant Law & Policy Program

(225) 578-6342

nlpace@lsu.edu